000 02484nab a22003617a 4500
001 G94190
003 MX-TxCIM
005 20230417212846.0
008 210714s2010 xxk|||p|op||| 00| 0 eng d
022 _a0030-7270
022 _a2043-6866 (Online)
024 8 _ahttps://doi.org/10.5367/000000010791745330
040 _aMX-TxCIM
041 _aeng
090 _aCIS-6011
100 1 _aErenstein, O.
_gFormerly Socioeconomics Program
_8INT2677
_9848
245 1 0 _aAssessing the impact of adaptive agricultural research on accelerating technology deployment :
_bthe case of zero tillage wheat in India
260 _aUnited Kingdom :
_bSAGE Publications,
_c2010.
500 _aPeer review
500 _aPeer-review: Yes - Open Access: Yes|http://science.thomsonreuters.com/cgi-bin/jrnlst/jlresults.cgi?PC=MASTER&ISSN=0030-7270
520 _aA critical assumption in the impact assessment of an agricultural R&D effort is whether the effort in question has a substitute – that is, whether the innovation would also happen under other settings. This paper takes the case of zero tillage wheat in India to explore diverging counterfactual scenarios whereby, in the ‘without’ case, the innovation would not have been introduced or would have been introduced only with a ten-year or five-year lag. The authors quantify how the assumed counterfactual scenario affects various impact assessment indicators. They show that, even when assuming a conservative five-year lag and based on induced supply-shift gains alone, the investment in zero tillage R&D by the international agricultural research system was highly beneficial. The ability of zero tillage to combine cost savings and yield gains, its wide applicability and significant R&D spill-ins contributed to the high returns. The case thus highlights the high potential gains from successful adaptive research, even if the main effect is only to accelerate technology deployment.
536 _aSocioeconomics Program
546 _aText in English
594 _aINT2677
650 7 _aImpact assessment
_2AGROVOC
_98668
650 7 _aResearch
_2AGROVOC
_99142
650 7 _aInnovation adoption
_2AGROVOC
_91160
650 7 _aZero tillage
_2AGROVOC
_91753
700 _aLaxmi, V.
_96292
773 0 _tOutlook on Agriculture
_gv. 39, no. 2, p. 121-126
_dUnited Kingdom : SAGE Publications, 2010.
_wG444646
_x0030-7270
856 4 _uhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12665/72
_yAccess only for CIMMYT Staff
942 _cJA
_2ddc
_n0
999 _c28136
_d28136