000 02510nab a22003617a 4500
001 G94047
003 MX-TxCIM
005 20230724211229.0
008 210629s2010 xxk|||p|op||| 00| 0 eng d
022 _a1469-4441 (Online)
022 0 _a0014-4797
024 8 _ahttps://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479710000049
040 _aMX-TxCIM
041 _aeng
090 _aCIS-5968
100 1 _aErenstein, O.
_gFormerly Socioeconomics Program
_8INT2677
_9848
245 1 0 _aVillage surveys for technology uptake monitoring :
_bcase of tillage dynamics in the trans-gangetic plains
260 _aUnited Kingdom :
_bCambridge University Press,
_c2010.
500 _aPeer review
500 _aPeer-review: Yes - Open Access: Yes|http://science.thomsonreuters.com/cgi-bin/jrnlst/jlresults.cgi?PC=MASTER&ISSN=0014-4797
520 _aAgricultural research and development (R&D) would benefit from reliable yet cheap technology uptake indicators to guide decision making. The paper explores the use of village surveys to monitor technology use and illustrates this through two empirical case studies into tillage dynamics in the Trans-Gangetic Plains in northwest India. The first case study is a revisit of 50 communities surveyed earlier in Haryana State. The second case study is a new and wider representative sample of 120 villages across Haryana and Punjab States. The case studies illustrate that after an initial rapid spread of tractor-drawn zero tillage drills for wheat seeding in these intensive systems, the zero + reduced tillage area seems to have stabilized there at between a fifth and a quarter of the wheat area. Conventional tillage for wheat continues to decline, with an increased use of rotavators making up the difference ? but its intensive shallow tillage goes against the conservation agriculture tenets. The paper illustrates the potential of village surveys to provide timely and cost-effective feedback to agricultural R&D.
536 _aSocioeconomics Program
546 _aText in English
594 _aINT2677
650 7 _2AGROVOC
_98057
_aAgricultural research for development
650 7 _2AGROVOC
_91988
_aTechnology
650 7 _2AGROVOC
_96476
_aSurveys
650 7 _2AGROVOC
_91832
_aTillage
650 7 _2AGROVOC
_91310
_aWheat
773 0 _tExperimental Agriculture
_gv. 46, no. 3, p. 277-292
_dUnited Kingdom : Cambridge University Press, 2010.
_wG444498
_x0014-4797
856 4 _uhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12665/525
_yAccess only for CIMMYT Staff
942 _cJA
_2ddc
_n0
999 _c28066
_d28066