000			02941nab a22003977a 4500
999			_c27272 _d27272
001			G91167
003			MX-TxCIM
005			20221213184914.0
008			200914s2008 ne |||p|op||| 00| 0 eng d
022	0		_a1161-0301
024	8		_ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2008.01.008
040			_aMX-TxCIM
041	0		_aeng
090			_aCIS-5406
100	1		_aLimon-Ortega, A. _915808
245	1	0	_aStraw management, crop rotation, and nitrogen source effect on wheat grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency
260			_aAmsterdam (Netherlands) : _bElsevier, _c2008.
340			_aComputer File|Printed
500			_aPeer review
500			_aPeer-review: Yes - Open Access: Yes|Yes|http://science.thomsonreuters.com/cgi-bin/jrnlst/jlresults.cgi?PC=MASTER&ISSN=1161-0301
520			_aNitrogen fertilizer management from different sources and annual crop rotations are important components of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production systems, especially where air and soil quality issues have prompted a search for alternatives to wheat straw burning. This study examined the effects of two different wheat straw management options (burning and incorporation by tillage), three crop rotations [wheat-sesbania (Sesbania spp.), wheat–maize (Zea mays L.), and wheat-clean fallow] and three N sources (urea, chicken manure, and urea plus chicken manure) on wheat grain yield and N use efficiency. The experiment was conducted as split–split plot treatment arrangement with three replications for eight wheat cropping seasons in the state of Sonora, Mexico. Results indicated that both wheat grain yield and N use efficiency were higher with burning than incorporation of wheat straw and with fertilization with urea or urea plus chicken manure than chicken manure alone. As shown by the crop rotation-by-straw management interaction, planting sesbania following incorporation of the straw by tillage produced comparable grain yields to straw burning treatment. In contrast, wheat in annual rotation with maize produced the lowest wheat grain yield and N use efficiency irrespective of the wheat straw management and N source applied.
536			_aConservation Agriculture Program
546			_aText in English
591			_aElsevier
594			_aINT2813|CSAY01
650		7	_aNitrogen _2AGROVOC _92912
650		7	_aOrganic fertilizers _2AGROVOC _91740
650		7	_aUrea _2AGROVOC _99626
650		7	_aBurning _2AGROVOC _915809
650		7	_aSesbania _2AGROVOC _915810
700	1		_aGovaerts, B. _gSustainable Intensification Program _gIntegrated Development Program _gDG's Office _8INT2813 _9860
700	1		_94612 _aSayre, K.D. _gSustainable Intensification Program _8CSAY01
773	0		_tEuropean Journal of Agronomy _n635368 _gv. 29, no. 1, p. 21-28 _dAmsterdam (Netherlands) : Elsevier, 2008. _wu446870 _x1161-0301
856	4		_uhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12665/80 _yAccess only for CIMMYT Staff
942			_cJA _2ddc _n0