| 000 | 01547nab a22002897a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | G91035 | ||
| 003 | MX-TxCIM | ||
| 005 | 20190702221458.0 | ||
| 008 | 121211b |||p||p||||||| |z||| | | ||
| 040 | _aMX-TxCIM | ||
| 100 | 1 | _aWakida, F.T. | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 |
_aNon-agricultural sources of groundwater nitrate: _b a review and case study |
| 260 | _c2005 | ||
| 340 | _aComputer File | ||
| 520 | _aNitrate is often seen as an agricultural pollutant of groundwater and so is expected to be at higher concentrations in the groundwaters surrounding a city than in those beneath it. However the difference between rural and urban nitrate concentrations is often small, due to the non-agricultural sources of nitrogen that are concentrated in cities. This paper illustrates the source and significance of non-agricultural nitrogen for groundwater and presents a case study of nitrate loading in the city of Nottingham. Major sources of nitrogen in urban aquifers are related to wastewater disposal (on-site systems and leaky sewers), solid waste disposal (landfills and waste tips). The major sources of nitrogen in the Nottingham area are mains leakage and contaminated land with approximately 38% each of a total load of 21 kg N ha-1 year-1. | ||
| 546 | _aEnglish | ||
| 591 | _aElsevier | ||
| 650 | 1 | 0 | _aContamination |
| 650 | 1 | 0 |
_91140 _aGroundwater _gAGROVOC |
| 650 | 1 | 0 | _aLeakage |
| 650 | 1 | 0 | _aNitrate |
| 650 | 1 | 0 | _aNottingham |
| 650 | 1 | 0 | _aUrban |
| 700 | 1 |
_aLerner, D.N., _ecoaut. |
|
| 773 | 0 |
_tWater Research _gv. 39, no. 1, p. 3-16 |
|
| 942 |
_cJA _2ddc |
||
| 999 |
_c27219 _d27219 |
||