000 03057nab a22004697a 4500
001 G76950
003 MX-TxCIM
005 20240919021145.0
008 210903s2003 xxu|||p|op||| 00| 0 eng d
022 _a1435-0653 (Online)
024 8 _ahttps://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2003.1764
040 _aMX-TxCIM
041 _aeng
072 0 _aF30
072 0 _aU30
090 _aCIS-3748
100 1 _9842
_aJiankang Wang
_gGenetic Resources Program
_8INT2542
245 1 0 _aComparison of Two Breeding Strategies by Computer Simulation
260 _aUSA :
_bCSSA :
_bWiley,
_c2003.
340 _aComputer File
500 _aPeer review
500 _aPeer-review: Yes - Open Access: Yes|http://science.thomsonreuters.com/cgi-bin/jrnlst/jlresults.cgi?PC=MASTER&ISSN=0011-183X
520 _aBreeding strategies used by plant breeders are many and varied, making it difficult to compare efficiencies of different breeding strategies through field experimentation. The objective of this paper was to compare, through computer simulation, two widely used breeding strategies, the modified pedigree/bulk selection method (MODPED) and the selected bulk selection method (SELBLK), in CIMMYT's wheat breeding program. The genetic models developed accounted for epistasis, pleiotropy, and genotype × environment (GE) interaction. The simulation experiment comprised the same 1000 crosses, developed from 200 parents, for both breeding strategies. A total of 258 advanced lines remained following 10 generations of selection. The two strategies were each applied 500 times on 12 GE systems. Findings indicated that genetic gain from SELBLK was on average 3.9% higher than that from MODPED, and genetic gain adjusted by target genotypes from SELBLK was on average 3.3% higher than MODPED for a wide range of genetic models. A greater proportion of crosses were retained (25% more) by means of SELBLK compared with MODPED, and from F1 to F8, SELBLK required one third less land than MODPED and produced fewer families (40% of the number for MODPED). For the genetic models considered in our study, computer simulations showed that the SELBLK method resulted in slightly greater genetic gain and significant improvements in cost effectiveness.
536 _aGenetic Resources Program
546 _aText in English
591 _a0309|Crop Science Society of America (CSSA)|AL-Wheat Program
594 _aINT2542
650 7 _aPlant breeding
_gAGROVOC
_2
_91203
650 7 _94739
_aComputer applications
_2AGROVOC
650 7 _99058
_aGene Interaction
_2AGROVOC
700 1 _aGinkel, M. Van
_997
700 1 _aPodlich, D.
_920341
700 0 _aGuoyou Ye
_920340
700 1 _9341
_aTrethowan, R.M.
700 1 _9648
_aPfeiffer, W.H.
700 1 _91427
_aDeLacy, I.H.
700 1 _96595
_aCooper, M.
700 1 _9661
_aRajaram, S.
773 0 _tCrop Science
_n632384
_gv. 43, no. 5, p. 1764-1773
_dUSA : CSSA : Wiley, 2003.
_wG444244
_x1435-0653
856 4 _yAccess only for CIMMYT Staff
_uhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12665/1304
942 _cJA
_2ddc
_n0
999 _c23052
_d23052