000 02581nab a22004457a 4500
001 G75684
003 MX-TxCIM
005 20230626164638.0
008 210810s2001 ne |||p|op||| 00| 0 eng d
022 _a1574-0862 (Online)
022 0 _a0169-5150
024 8 _ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5150(00)00129-8
040 _aMX-TxCIM
041 _aeng
072 0 _aE10
072 0 _aE14
090 _aCIS-3247
100 1 _aKosarek, J.L.
_922014
245 1 0 _aFactors explaining the diffusion of hybrid maize in Latin America and the Caribbean region
260 _aNetherlands :
_bElsevier,
_c2001.
340 _aPrinted
500 _aPeer review
500 _aPeer-review: Yes - Open Access: Yes|http://science.thomsonreuters.com/cgi-bin/jrnlst/jlresults.cgi?PC=MASTER&ISSN=0169-5150
520 _aIf future demand for maize in Latin America and the Caribbean region (LAC) is to be met from local sources, domestic production must continue to increase. Because further expansion in the area planted to maize is precluded by the limited availability of arable land, future increases in production will have to rely heavily on the spread of productivity-enhancing hybrid technology. Until now, the diffusion of hybrid maize in LAC has been quite variable. Using data from 18 countries, we investigate factors affecting the hybrid maize diffusion rate. Our findings validate conventional profitability-based explanations of producer adoption behavior, but they also confirm the importance of supply-side factors, thereby providing empirical support for the life cycle theory of seed industry development. We conclude that if policy makers in LAC are to accelerate the diffusion of hybrid maize, they will have to ensure an environment in which it is not only profitable for producers to adopt improved germplasm, but also profitable for the seed industry to produce and sell high-quality seed.
536 _aSocioeconomics Program
546 _aText in English
591 _a0112|John Wiley|AL-Economics Program|R01JOURN|3
592 _aUS-UIllinois 1999 KOSAREK M rf
595 _aCSC
650 7 _91173
_aMaize
_2AGROVOC
650 7 _91151
_aHybrids
_2AGROVOC
650 7 _96415
_aTechnology transfer
_2AGROVOC
700 1 _aGarcia, P.
_922015
700 1 _9608
_aMorris, M.L.
740 _a68452
740 _a75684
773 0 _tAgricultural Economics
_n629688
_gv. 26, no. 3, p. 267-280
_dNetherlands : Elsevier, 2001.
_wG444456
_x0169-5150
856 4 _uhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12665/894
_yAccess only for CIMMYT Staff
942 _cJA
_2ddc
_n0
999 _c22266
_d22266