000			02001nab a22002897a 4500
001			G69630
003			MX-TxCIM
005			20230220203848.0
008			121211b |||p||p||||||| |z||| |
022			_a0006-341X
022			_a1541-0420
024			_2https://doi.org/10.2307/2527600
040			_aMX-TxCIM
041			_aeng
090			_aREP-850
100	1		_aPatterson, H.D. _930064
245	1	4	_aThe analysis of a non-replicated experiment involving a single four-course rotation of crops
260			_c1959. _aUnited Kingdom : _bInternational Biometric Society,
340			_aPrinted
520			_aThe analysis of crop rotatioin experiments presents a number of problems which are not encountered in the analysis of annual experiments. Some of these problems have been discussed in a general account of long-term experiments by Cochran [1939]. More recently methods of analysing two types of rotation experiment have been considered in greater detail. These two types are: (a) experiments comparing the effects of different treatments on the crops of a fixed rotation, and (b) experiments comparing the effects of different rotations. The analysis of experiments of type (b) has been considered by Yates [1954]. Some points arising in the analysis of replicated experiments of type (a) have been discussed by Patterson [1953]. The present paper deals with the analysis of an experiment of type (a) in which the treatments were not replicated in each year, and which consequently gives rise to a number of problems which were only briefly considered by Patterson [1953]. The discussion should be of some general interest as non-replication is likely to be a feature of many rotation experiments.
595			_aRPC
650		7	_2AGROVOC _91807 _aCrop rotation
650		7	_2AGROVOC _94432 _aExperimentation
650		7	_2AGROVOC _92624 _aStatistical methods
773	0		_tBiometrics _gv. 15, no. 1, p. 30-59 _dUnited Kingdom : International Biometric Society, 1959. _x0006-341X
942			_cJA _2ddc
999			_c20244 _d20244