000			01749nab a22003257a 4500
001			G69555
003			MX-TxCIM
005			20230208184341.0
008			121211b |||p||p||||||| |z||| |
022			_a0361-5995
022			_a1435-0661 (Online)
024			_2https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1956.03615995002000040005x
040			_aMX-TxCIM
041			_aeng
090			_aREP-709
100	1		_aKamprath, E.J. _929990
245	1	4	_aThe effect of pH, sulfate and phosphate concentrations on the adsorption of sulfate by soils
260			_c1956. _aMadison, WI (USA) : _bWiley,
340			_aPrinted
520			_aSome of the factors affecting sulfate adsorption were studied using Cecil, White Store, and Nipe soils and H-Al-bentonite. The soils which contained a relatively large amount of 1:1 type clay minerals adsorbed more sulfate than the soils containing predominantly 2:1 type clay minerals. The amount of sulfate adsorbed decreased as the pH of the soil suspension increased from 4 to 6. The amount of sulfate adsorbed was found to be directly related to the concentration of sulfate in solution. For all of the soils studied, increasing the phosphate concentration in the solution reduced the amount of sulfate adsorbed by the soil. The data indicate that less sulfate ion is adsorbed by the clay particle in the presence of phosphate ion.
546			_aText in English
595			_aRPC
650		7	_2AGROVOC _929991 _aPH effects
650		7	_2AGROVOC _95224 _aPhosphates
650		7	_2AGROVOC _94828 _aSoil
700	1		_aNelson, W.L. _929992
700			_aFitts, J.W _929993
773	0		_tSoil Science Society of America Journal _gv. 20, no. 4, p. 463-466 _d Madison, WI (USA) : Wiley, 1956. _wG444110 _x1435-0661
942			_cJA _2ddc
999			_c20172 _d20172