000			01647nab a22003137a 4500
001			G65421
003			MX-TxCIM
005			20170719110410.0
008			121211b |||p||p||||||| |z||| |
022	0		_a0001-2351
040			_aMX-TxCIM
082	0	4	_a95-042794
100	1		_aCooke, R.A.
245	0	0	_aAssessment of methods for interpolating steady-state infiltrability
260			_c1993
340			_aPrinted
500			_areferences US (DNAL 290.9 Am32T)
520			_aThe effect of interpolation method on the estimation of steady state infiltrability was evaluated. Four interpolation methods, namely, the inverse stance weighting method, punctual kriging with the assumption of a linear semi-variogram, quintic polynomial interpolation, and the method of minimum surface curvature, were evaluated These methods were found to produce significantly different interpolated surfaces. While all the methods failed to reproduce the complexity of the true infiltrability distribution, conventional inverse-distance weighting produced the most accurate surfaces. There was no significant increase in accuracy for grid saturation densities in excess of 25%, nor was there any advantage to interpolating with log infiltrability instead of infiltrability
546			_aEnglish
595			_aAC
650	1	0	_aChemicophysical properties
650	1	0	_aMathematical and statistical methods
650	1	0	_aSoil chemistry and physics
650	1	0	_aWater circulation
700	1		_aCampbell, J.B., _ecoaut.
700	1		_aMostaghimi, S., _ecoaut.
773	0		_tTransactions of the ASAE (USA). (Sep-Oct 1993). v. 36(5) p. 1333-1341
942			_cJA
999			_c18868 _d18868