| 000 | 01629nab a22004097a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | G53888 | ||
| 003 | MX-TxCIM | ||
| 008 | 121211b |||p||p||||||| |z||| | | ||
| 022 | 0 | _a0022-4561 | |
| 040 | _aMX-TxCIM | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aEn | |
| 043 | _aUS | ||
| 072 | 0 | _aE20 | |
| 072 | 0 | _aP36 | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | _a89-041067 |
| 100 | 1 | _aSetia, P.P. | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aConsideration of risk in soil conservation analysis |
| 260 | _c1988 | ||
| 340 | _aPrinted | ||
| 500 | _aTables, references p. 437 | ||
| 520 | _aFarm-level soil conservation decisions with uncertain income are examined. Results from a stochastic economics model show that the variability in farm income due to crop prices, crop yield, weather and farmers' risk attitudes influence the selection of a soil conservation management system. Public conservation programs can be more effective if they are based on analyses considering uncertainty. Two decision criteria, expected utility maximisation and safty-first, were selected to compare the ranking of certain management systems under each criterion. | ||
| 546 | _aEnglish | ||
| 591 | _aCOMOD | ||
| 595 | _aAC | ||
| 650 | 1 | 0 | _aBehaviour |
| 650 | 1 | 0 |
_aConservation _91054 |
| 650 | 1 | 0 | _aMathematical and statistical methods |
| 650 | 1 | 0 | _aMathematics |
| 650 | 1 | 0 | _aOperations research |
| 650 | 1 | 0 | _aOrganization, administration and management of agricultural enterpri |
| 650 | 1 | 0 | _aResearch |
| 650 | 1 | 0 | _aResource conservation |
| 650 | 1 | 0 |
_aSoil conservation _92273 |
| 650 | 1 | 0 |
_aSoil management _91268 |
| 773 | 0 |
_tJournal of Soil and Water Conservation _n89-041067 _gv. 42, no. 6, p. 435-437 |
|
| 942 | _cJA | ||
| 999 |
_c16169 _d16169 |
||