| 000 | 01519nab a22003497a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | G33938 | ||
| 003 | MX-TxCIM | ||
| 005 | 20211006074952.0 | ||
| 008 | 121211b |||p||p||||||| |z||| | | ||
| 040 | _aMX-TxCIM | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aEn | |
| 043 | _aUS | ||
| 072 | 0 | _aC20 | |
| 090 | _aREP-4025 | ||
| 100 | 1 | _aKhan, A. | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aAn alternative institutional path for getting "extension" to farmers |
| 260 | _c1987 | ||
| 340 | _aPrinted | ||
| 520 | _aThe paper considers the possibility of using local councillors (LCs), popularly elected government representatives in rural villages, to carry out some of the functions associated with the formal agricultural extension system. The results of a pilot survey of 100 farmers in two Union Council areas in BannuDistrict, Pakistan Northwest Frontier, are examined. LCs in the area studied areperforming extension-type functions but their effectiveness is limited because they have little knowledge of recent research and practices; they tend not to have formal contact with extension; and they have no formal training in extension techniques. Given the | ||
| 546 | _aEnglish | ||
| 591 | _aJohn Wiley | ||
| 595 | _aRPC | ||
| 650 | 1 | 0 | _aExtension activities |
| 650 | 1 | 0 | _aInformation flow |
| 650 | 1 | 7 |
_aInnovation adoption _gAGROVOC _2 _91160 |
| 650 | 1 | 0 | _aTechnology transfer |
| 650 | 1 | 0 | _aTraining programmes |
| 700 | 1 |
_aAhmad, I., _ecoaut. |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aSofranko, A.J., _ecoaut. |
|
| 773 | 0 |
_tRural Sociology _n617610 _gv. 7, no. 1, p. 59-65 |
|
| 942 | _cJA | ||
| 999 |
_c12240 _d12240 |
||