000 | 01522nab a22003377a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | G28851 | ||
003 | MX-TxCIM | ||
008 | 121211b |||p||p||||||| |z||| | | ||
040 | _aMX-TxCIM | ||
041 | 0 | _aEn | |
043 | _aUS | ||
072 | 0 | _aE10 | |
072 | 0 | _aP36 | |
090 | _aREP-3871 | ||
100 | 1 | _aEpplin, F.M. | |
245 | 0 | 0 | _aInfluence of crop and farm size on adoption of conservation tillage |
260 | _c1986 | ||
340 | _aPrinted | ||
500 | _aTables, references p. 426-427 | ||
520 | _aReasons for differences in rates of adoption of conservation tillage were investigated. Investment requirements for acquisition of management skills are larger per unit produced on smaller farms. The transition from conventional to no-till practices requires relatively more investment in management skills for some crops. Least-cost machinery complements were estimated for two wheat production systems and four farm sizes. If the machinery complement must be adjusted, adoption of conservation tillage will be slower on smaller farms on which machinery is replaced less frequently. Differences in rates of adoption byfarm size occur because of | ||
546 | _aEnglish | ||
595 | _aRPC | ||
650 | 1 | 7 |
_aEconomics _gAGROVOC _2 _91093 |
650 | 1 | 0 | _aFarm size |
650 | 1 | 7 |
_aInnovation adoption _gAGROVOC _2 _91160 |
650 | 1 | 0 |
_aSoil conservation _92273 |
650 | 1 | 0 |
_91832 _aTillage _gAGROVOC |
700 | 1 |
_aTice, T.F., _ecoaut. |
|
773 | 0 |
_tJournal of Soil and Water Conservation _n615043 _gv. 41, no. 6, p. 424-427 |
|
942 | _cJA | ||
999 |
_c11971 _d11971 |