000 | 01556nab a22003257a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | G28754 | ||
003 | MX-TxCIM | ||
008 | 121211b |||p||p||||||| |z||| | | ||
040 | _aMX-TxCIM | ||
041 | 0 | _aEn | |
043 | _aUS | ||
072 | 0 | _aP36 | |
090 | _aREP-4872 | ||
100 | 1 | _aPadgitt, M. | |
245 | 0 | 0 | _aSoil diversity and the effects of field eligibility rules in implementing soil conservation programs targeted to highly erodible land |
260 | _c1989 | ||
340 | _aPrinted | ||
500 | _aTables, graphs, references p. 95 | ||
520 | _aThis study provides new information on the proportion of highly erodible land that occurs within fields used for crop production and analyzes the potential efficiency with which programmes targeted to highly erodible land may be implemented. The Conservation Reserve Program and conservation compliance provision eligibility rules were applied to 1,162 randomly selected maize and soyabean fields in Illinois, Iowa, and Missouri. An estimated 9 percent of the land in fields eligible for the CRP are not highly erodible. About 5 percent of the highly erodible land acreage used to produce maize and soyabeans is not eligible for the CRP because of the soil | ||
546 | _aEnglish | ||
595 | _aRPC | ||
650 | 1 | 0 | _aEroded soils |
650 | 1 | 0 |
_aErosion _91961 |
650 | 1 | 0 | _aErosion control |
650 | 1 | 7 |
_aInnovation adoption _gAGROVOC _2 _91160 |
650 | 1 | 0 |
_aSoil conservation _92273 |
650 | 1 | 0 | _aSoil resources |
773 | 0 |
_tJournal of Soil and Water Conservation _n615155 _gv. 44, no. 1, p. 91-95 |
|
942 | _cJA | ||
999 |
_c11890 _d11890 |