000			01556nab a22003737a 4500
001			G26034
003			MX-TxCIM
005			20190315193616.0
008			121211b |||p||p||||||| |z||| |
040			_aMX-TxCIM
041	0		_aEn
043			_aGB
072		0	_aF30
090			_aREP-4071
100	1		_aGoldberg, E.D.
245	0	0	_aCompetitive effect and response in four annual plants
260			_c1987
340			_aPrinted
520			_aNeighbourhood experiments were used to compare the magnitudes of competitiveeffect and competitive response using all pairwise combinations of Papaver rhoeas, wheat and oats as neighbour species, and these 3 species plus Chenopodium album as target species. Over 79% of the variance in target wt was explained by a simple hyperbolic function of neighbour wt or density for 7 out of the 12 species combinations. For all 4 target species, the 2 grass neighbour species always had statistically equivalent competitive effects that were generally greater than the effects of P. rhoeas. For all 3 neighbour species, P.rhoeas was the weakest competitor in
546			_aEnglish
591			_aJohn Wiley
595			_aRPC
650	1	0	_aAvena sativa
650	1	0	_aBiological competition _91022
650	1	0	_aChenopodium
650	1	0	_aExperiments
650	1	0	_aGreenhouses
650	1	0	_aPapaver
650	1	0	_91213 _aPlant response _gAGROVOC
650	1	0	_91296 _aTriticum aestivum _gAGROVOC
700	1		_aFleetwood, L., _ecoaut.
773	0		_tJournal of Ecology _n609922 _gv. 75, no. 4, p. 1131-1143
942			_cJA
999			_c11778 _d11778