| 000 | 01903nab a22004577a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c11712 _d11712 |
||
| 001 | G23412 | ||
| 003 | MX-TxCIM | ||
| 005 | 20211006075644.0 | ||
| 008 | 210811s1990 xxu|||p|op||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 022 | _a0002-9092 | ||
| 022 | _a1467-8276 (Online) | ||
| 024 | 8 | _ahttps://doi.org/10.2307/1243036 | |
| 040 | _aMX-TxCIM | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 043 | _aUS | ||
| 072 | 0 | _aE80 | |
| 090 | _aLook under series title | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aRenkow, M. _9669 |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 | _aHousehold inventories and marketed surplus in semisubsistence agriculture |
| 260 |
_aUSA : _bWiley, _c1990. |
||
| 340 | _aPrinted | ||
| 500 | _aPeer review | ||
| 500 | _aGraphs, references p. 675 | ||
| 520 | _aA model of semisubsistence agriculture explicitly accounting for the ability of farm households to hold inventories of staple foods is developed. Comparative statics analysis highlights the potential importance of wealth effects attributable to price-induced changes in the value of household inventories. Empirical results for three groups of households in an Indian village confum that failure to account for household inventories leads to an overstatement of the responsiveness of both consumption demand and marketed surplus. | ||
| 536 | _aSocioeconomics Program | ||
| 546 | _aText in English | ||
| 591 | _aR100ECO|EP|MIC 9892-R|SEP archives | ||
| 650 | 1 | 0 |
_aHome economics _92490 |
| 650 | 1 | 0 |
_aHouseholds _92743 |
| 650 | 1 | 0 |
_aIndia _91156 |
| 650 | 1 | 0 | _aMarketing |
| 650 | 1 | 0 | _aModels |
| 650 | 1 | 7 |
_aSmall farms _gAGROVOC _2 _91260 |
| 650 | 1 | 0 | _aSubsistence farming |
| 650 | 1 | 0 | _aSurpluses |
| 650 | 1 | 0 | _aSurveys |
| 650 | 1 | 0 |
_91109 _aFarming systems _2AGROVOC |
| 773 | 0 |
_tAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics _n624915 _gv. 72, no. 3, p. 664-675 _dUSA : Wiley, 1990. _wG444480 _x1467-8276 |
|
| 856 | 4 |
_yAccess only for CIMMYT Staff _uhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12665/1217 |
|
| 942 |
_cJA _2ddc _n0 |
||