TY  - JA
AU  - Delmotte,S.
AU  - Barbier,J-M
AU  - Wery,J.
AU  - Lopez-Ridaura,S.
TI  - Prospective and participatory integrated assessment of agricultural systems from farm to regional scales:  Comparison of three modeling approaches
SN  - 1095-8630
PY  - 2013///
KW  - Agent-Based Model
KW  - Bio-Economic Model
KW  - Land use change model
KW  - scenario
KW  - Stakeholder
N2  - Evaluating the impacts of the development of alternative agricultural systems, such as organic or low-input cropping systems, in the context of an agricultural region requires the use of specific tools and methodologies. They should allow a prospective (using scenarios), multi-scale (taking into account the field, farm and regional level), integrated (notably multicriteria) and participatory assessment, abbreviated PIAAS (for Participatory Integrated Assessment of Agricultural System). In this paper, we compare the possible contribution to PIAAS of three modeling approaches i.e. Bio-Economic Modeling (BEM), Agent-Based Modeling (ABM) and statistical Land-Use/Land Cover Change (LUCC) models. After a presentation of each approach, we analyze their advantages and drawbacks, and identify their possible complementarities for PIAAS. Statistical LUCC modeling is a suitable approach for multi-scale analysis of past changes and can be used to start discussion about the futures with stakeholders. BEM and ABM approaches have complementary features for scenarios assessment at different scales. While ABM has been widely used for participatory assessment, BEM has been rarely used satisfactorily in a participatory manner. On the basis of these results, we propose to combine these three approaches in a framework targeted to PIAAS
DO  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.08.001
T2  - Journal of Environmental Management
ER  -