Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Nitrogen and water use efficiencies of wheat and barley under a Mediterranean environment in Catalonia

By: Cossani, C.M.
Contributor(s): Savin, R [coaut.] | Slafer, G.A.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticlePublisher: 2012ISSN: No (Revista en electrónico); 0378-4290.Subject(s): Grain yield | Hordeum vulgare | nitrogen uptake | Triticum durum | Water use | Triticum aestivum AGROVOC In: Field Crops Research v. 128, p. 109-118Summary: In Southern Mediterranean regions, farmers usually grow barley monocultures in drought-prone areas while wheat is grown in better-watered regions. This is based on an assumption of better performance of barley than wheat in terms of productivity and resource capture. Information about the comparative performance of these species under scarce resource availability is rudimentary. The aim of the present work was to compare the performance of bread and durum wheat and barley in terms of water use, nitrogen uptake, water use efficiency and nitrogen use efficiency under Mediterranean environments. Four experiments were conducted on farmers? fields at Agramunt, in the province of Lleida (Catalonia, north-eastern Spain) during 2004/05, 2005/06 and 2006/07. Treatments consisted of barley, bread wheat and durum wheat grown under different combinations of water (rainfed or irrigated) and nitrogen availabilities. Water and nitrogen availabilities resulted in a wide range of water use efficiency (from 6.3 to 23 kggrain ha−1 mm−1) and nitrogen use efficiency (from 2.9 to 31.8 kggrain kgavailable N−1 in soil). Nitrogen uptake was closely and positively related to grain yield and total biomass at maturity for the three species. Nitrogen fertilization modified yield of the three species, mainly through changes in water use efficiency (R2 = 0.75). Differences between the species were low but existed in relative terms; they were not always in favor of barley. In fact, barley did not consistently outperform bread or durum wheat in terms of resource use or resource use efficiency under poor-yielding conditions. The relative differences between wheat and barley in terms of grain yield (analyzed as wheat yield/barley yield) were explained by the relative differences between them in terms of nitrogen use efficiency and water use efficiency (analyzed as wheat resource use efficiency/barley resource use efficiency).Collection: Reprints Collection
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode Item holds
Article CIMMYT Knowledge Center: John Woolston Library

Lic. Jose Juan Caballero Flores

 

Reprints Collection Available
Total holds: 0

Peer-review: Yes - Open Access: Yes|http://science.thomsonreuters.com/cgi-bin/jrnlst/jlresults.cgi?PC=MASTER&ISSN=0378-4290

In Southern Mediterranean regions, farmers usually grow barley monocultures in drought-prone areas while wheat is grown in better-watered regions. This is based on an assumption of better performance of barley than wheat in terms of productivity and resource capture. Information about the comparative performance of these species under scarce resource availability is rudimentary. The aim of the present work was to compare the performance of bread and durum wheat and barley in terms of water use, nitrogen uptake, water use efficiency and nitrogen use efficiency under Mediterranean environments. Four experiments were conducted on farmers? fields at Agramunt, in the province of Lleida (Catalonia, north-eastern Spain) during 2004/05, 2005/06 and 2006/07. Treatments consisted of barley, bread wheat and durum wheat grown under different combinations of water (rainfed or irrigated) and nitrogen availabilities. Water and nitrogen availabilities resulted in a wide range of water use efficiency (from 6.3 to 23 kggrain ha−1 mm−1) and nitrogen use efficiency (from 2.9 to 31.8 kggrain kgavailable N−1 in soil). Nitrogen uptake was closely and positively related to grain yield and total biomass at maturity for the three species. Nitrogen fertilization modified yield of the three species, mainly through changes in water use efficiency (R2 = 0.75). Differences between the species were low but existed in relative terms; they were not always in favor of barley. In fact, barley did not consistently outperform bread or durum wheat in terms of resource use or resource use efficiency under poor-yielding conditions. The relative differences between wheat and barley in terms of grain yield (analyzed as wheat yield/barley yield) were explained by the relative differences between them in terms of nitrogen use efficiency and water use efficiency (analyzed as wheat resource use efficiency/barley resource use efficiency).

Global Wheat Program

English

No CIMMYT affiliation|Elsevier

Carelia Juarez

INT3189

Reprints Collection

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.
baner

International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) © Copyright 2015. Carretera México-Veracruz. Km. 45, El Batán, Texcoco, México, C.P. 56237.
Monday –Friday 9:00 am. 17:00 pm. If you have any question, please contact us at CIMMYT-Knowledge-Center@cgiar.org

Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz y Trigo (CIMMYT) © Copyright 2015. Carretera México-Veracruz. Km. 45, El Batán, Texcoco, México, C.P. 56237.
Lunes –Viernes 9:00 am. 17:00 pm. Si tiene cualquier pregunta, contáctenos a CIMMYT-Knowledge-Center@cgiar.org