Knowledge Center Catalog

Local cover image
Local cover image

Participatory development of a biological control strategy of the variegated grasshopper in the humid tropics in West Africa

By: Contributor(s): Material type: ArticleArticleLanguage: English Publication details: United Kingdom : Elsevier, 2002.ISSN:
  • 0261-2194
Subject(s): Online resources: In: Crop Protection v. 21, no. 4, p. 265-275631219Summary: The results of a participatory rural appraisal (PRA) in 3 villages in the Couffo district of Benin show that the variegated grasshopper Zonocerus variegatus L. is a major, but recent, crop pest. Farmers’ knowledge of grasshopper biology is limited and they have not yet developed indigenous control methods. Villagers were keen to collaborate in a participatory research, testing alternative control methods. A demonstration of biological control of grasshoppers was organized, followed by the training of a group of six farmers per village—the village brigade, who will be in charge of grasshopper control in their village. After the training, where grasshopper biology and the advantages and disadvantages of different control options were discussed, it was agreed to test a biological pesticide, an oil-based formulation of the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae var. acridum, in a participatory research program. The village brigades chose to test two different strategies: preventive control by treating the young larval stages and curative control by treating adult grasshoppers, with two different sprayers (flit gun and spinning-disc sprayer). Both strategies were tested at three different doses (2, 20 and 50 g of spores/ha). Results show that the dose can be reduced to 20 g/ha without loss of efficacy, so the cost of the treatment (estimated at $20/100 g or $4/ha) is within the farmer's reach. Participatory testing also revealed that treating the uncultivated areas is not a practical strategy. Finally, although battery -powered spinning-disc sprayers are more expensive than the hand-powered flit gun sprayers, their higher efficacy justifies the extra expense. The villagers proposed that grasshopper biological control be organized by village brigades, in close collaboration with the village association of cotton growers, who will provide credit. For the 1998–1999 season, this strategy was proposed and accepted in 18 new villages, and each village organized a brigade, trained by the project. Women, who generally manage their own fields, preferred a separate brigade, and three female brigades have been trained so far.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Call number Copy number Status Date due Barcode Item holds
Article CIMMYT Knowledge Center: John Woolston Library CIMMYT Staff Publications Collection CIS-2105 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 631219
Total holds: 0

Peer review

Peer-review: Yes - Open Access: Yes|http://science.thomsonreuters.com/cgi-bin/jrnlst/jlresults.cgi?PC=MASTER&ISSN=0261-2194

The results of a participatory rural appraisal (PRA) in 3 villages in the Couffo district of Benin show that the variegated grasshopper Zonocerus variegatus L. is a major, but recent, crop pest. Farmers’ knowledge of grasshopper biology is limited and they have not yet developed indigenous control methods. Villagers were keen to collaborate in a participatory research, testing alternative control methods. A demonstration of biological control of grasshoppers was organized, followed by the training of a group of six farmers per village—the village brigade, who will be in charge of grasshopper control in their village. After the training, where grasshopper biology and the advantages and disadvantages of different control options were discussed, it was agreed to test a biological pesticide, an oil-based formulation of the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae var. acridum, in a participatory research program. The village brigades chose to test two different strategies: preventive control by treating the young larval stages and curative control by treating adult grasshoppers, with two different sprayers (flit gun and spinning-disc sprayer). Both strategies were tested at three different doses (2, 20 and 50 g of spores/ha). Results show that the dose can be reduced to 20 g/ha without loss of efficacy, so the cost of the treatment (estimated at $20/100 g or $4/ha) is within the farmer's reach. Participatory testing also revealed that treating the uncultivated areas is not a practical strategy. Finally, although battery -powered spinning-disc sprayers are more expensive than the hand-powered flit gun sprayers, their higher efficacy justifies the extra expense. The villagers proposed that grasshopper biological control be organized by village brigades, in close collaboration with the village association of cotton growers, who will provide credit. For the 1998–1999 season, this strategy was proposed and accepted in 18 new villages, and each village organized a brigade, trained by the project. Women, who generally manage their own fields, preferred a separate brigade, and three female brigades have been trained so far.

Socioeconomics Program

Text in English

0206|Elsevier|AGRIS-0201|AL-Economics Program|R01JOUR

INT2512

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Local cover image

International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) © Copyright 2021.
Carretera México-Veracruz. Km. 45, El Batán, Texcoco, México, C.P. 56237.
If you have any question, please contact us at
CIMMYT-Knowledge-Center@cgiar.org