Conservation tillage: perceived and actual use
Material type: ArticleLanguage: En Publication details: 1987Subject(s): In: Journal of Soil and Water Conservation v. 42, no. 6, p. 431-434615060Summary: A mail survey of farmers in Nebraska showed their perceived use of conservation tillage was about 55%. However, using the 30% residue cover criterion that the Conservation Tillage Information Center uses to define conservation tillage, a field survey of seven counties in 1984 showed that actual use of conservation tillage was less than 5%. Fewer than 20% of the producers surveyed had more than 20% residue cover remaining after tillage and planting. The field survey also showed disk tillage systems were used by almost 70% of the producers. The moldboard plow was used by only 15% of the producers, thus creating an impression that conservation tillage hadItem type | Current library | Collection | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Article | CIMMYT Knowledge Center: John Woolston Library | Reprints Collection | REP-4078 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 615060 |
Browsing CIMMYT Knowledge Center: John Woolston Library shelves, Collection: Reprints Collection Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Tables, references p. 434
A mail survey of farmers in Nebraska showed their perceived use of conservation tillage was about 55%. However, using the 30% residue cover criterion that the Conservation Tillage Information Center uses to define conservation tillage, a field survey of seven counties in 1984 showed that actual use of conservation tillage was less than 5%. Fewer than 20% of the producers surveyed had more than 20% residue cover remaining after tillage and planting. The field survey also showed disk tillage systems were used by almost 70% of the producers. The moldboard plow was used by only 15% of the producers, thus creating an impression that conservation tillage had
English
Reprints Collection