Knowledge Center Catalog

Weeding effects on crop transpiration and weed water use: quantification

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextPublication details: Addis Ababa (Ethiopia) CIMMYT|EARO : 1999Description: p. 327-330ISBN:
  • 92-9146-065-6
Subject(s): DDC classification:
  • 633.15 EAS No. 6
Summary: In Zimbabwe, drought severely limits maize production, especially on poor, sandy soils in the communal areas. Weed transpiration exacerbates the problem. Correlating crop responses with water conservation practices requires an accurate assessment of the soil water balance. Three methods to calculate evapotranspiration and drainage were compared. Data came from a weeded and an unweeded fallow, and a weeded and unweeded crop. The methods were a simple weekly soil water balance (SWB), a method which used an exponential decay curve to generate a daily estimate of soil moisture and evapotranspiration, and a functional crop growth model. The seasonal evapotranspiration estimate was much higher with the SWB than with the other methods, because it overestimated evaporation due to the weekly time step. Also when the four treatments were compared, the SWB deviated from the other methods. These showed the same trends, more pronounced differences between treatments, and they separated evaporation and weed water use from crop transpiration. The simplicity of the SWB makes it a practical, qualitative tool to compare within-trial differences. The higher accuracy of the other methods, and the better opportunities for extrapolating the results to neighbouring agro-ecological environments, should be weighted against their greater complexity and the research needs.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

In Zimbabwe, drought severely limits maize production, especially on poor, sandy soils in the communal areas. Weed transpiration exacerbates the problem. Correlating crop responses with water conservation practices requires an accurate assessment of the soil water balance. Three methods to calculate evapotranspiration and drainage were compared. Data came from a weeded and an unweeded fallow, and a weeded and unweeded crop. The methods were a simple weekly soil water balance (SWB), a method which used an exponential decay curve to generate a daily estimate of soil moisture and evapotranspiration, and a functional crop growth model. The seasonal evapotranspiration estimate was much higher with the SWB than with the other methods, because it overestimated evaporation due to the weekly time step. Also when the four treatments were compared, the SWB deviated from the other methods. These showed the same trends, more pronounced differences between treatments, and they separated evaporation and weed water use from crop transpiration. The simplicity of the SWB makes it a practical, qualitative tool to compare within-trial differences. The higher accuracy of the other methods, and the better opportunities for extrapolating the results to neighbouring agro-ecological environments, should be weighted against their greater complexity and the research needs.

English

0103|AL-Maize Program|AGRIS 0102|AJ

CIMMYT Publications Collection


International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) © Copyright 2021.
Carretera México-Veracruz. Km. 45, El Batán, Texcoco, México, C.P. 56237.
If you have any question, please contact us at
CIMMYT-Knowledge-Center@cgiar.org