MARC details
| 000 -LEADER |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
01941nab a22002777a 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER |
|---|
| control field |
64130 |
| 003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER |
|---|
| control field |
MX-TxCIM |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION |
|---|
| control field |
20210902154621.0 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
210625s2021 xxk|||p|op||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 022 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD SERIAL NUMBER |
|---|
| International Standard Serial Number |
1754-6834 |
| 024 8# - OTHER STANDARD IDENTIFIER |
|---|
| Standard number or code |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-020-01864-z |
| 040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE |
|---|
| Original cataloging agency |
MX-TxCIM |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE |
|---|
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title |
eng |
| 100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
|---|
| 9 (RLIN) |
22459 |
| Personal name |
Postawa, K. |
| 245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT |
|---|
| Title |
Innovations in anaerobic digestion : |
| Remainder of title |
a model-based study |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT) |
|---|
| Place of publication, distribution, etc. |
London (United Kingdom) : |
| Name of publisher, distributor, etc. |
BioMed Central, |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. |
2021. |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE |
|---|
| General note |
Peer review |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE |
|---|
| General note |
Open Access |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
|---|
| Summary, etc. |
Background: Increasing the efficiency of the biogas production process is possible by modifying the technological installations of the biogas plant. In this study, specific solutions based on a mathematical model that lead to favorable results were proposed. Three configurations were considered: classical anaerobic digestion (AD) and its two modifications, two-phase AD (TPAD) and autogenerative high-pressure digestion (AHPD). The model has been validated based on measurements from a biogas plant located in Poland. Afterward, the TPAD and AHPD concepts were numerically tested for the same volume and feeding conditions. Results: The TPAD system increased the overall biogas production from 9.06 to 9.59%, depending on the feedstock composition, while the content of methane was slightly lower in the whole production chain. On the other hand, the AHPD provided the best purity of the produced fuel, in which a methane content value of 82.13% was reached. At the same time, the overpressure leads to a decrease of around 7.5% in the volumetric production efficiency. The study indicated that the dilution of maize silage with pig manure, instead of water, can have significant benefits in the selected configurations. The content of pig slurry strengthens the impact of the selected process modifications—in the first case, by increasing the production efficiency, and in the second, by improving the methane content in the biogas. Conclusions: The proposed mathematical model of the AD process proved to be a valuable tool for the description and design of biogas plant. The analysis shows that the overall impact of the presented process modifications is mutually opposite. The feedstock composition has a moderate and unsteady impact on the production profile, in the tested modifications. The dilution with pig manure, instead of water, leads to a slightly better efficiency in the classical configuration. For the TPAD process, the trend is very similar, but the AHPD biogas plant indicates a reverse tendency. Overall, the recommendation from this article is to use the AHPD concept if the composition of the biogas is the most important. In the case in which the performance is the most important factor, it is favorable to use the TPAD configuration. |
| 546 ## - LANGUAGE NOTE |
|---|
| Language note |
Text in English |
| 650 #7 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element |
Biogas |
| Source of heading or term |
AGROVOC |
| 9 (RLIN) |
8609 |
| 650 #7 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element |
Intensification |
| Source of heading or term |
AGROVOC |
| 9 (RLIN) |
1957 |
| 650 #7 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element |
Anaerobic treatment |
| Source of heading or term |
AGROVOC |
| 9 (RLIN) |
16099 |
| 650 #7 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element |
Digestion |
| Source of heading or term |
AGROVOC |
| 9 (RLIN) |
22460 |
| 650 #7 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element |
Case studies |
| Source of heading or term |
AGROVOC |
| 9 (RLIN) |
5663 |
| 650 #7 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element |
Modelling |
| Source of heading or term |
AGROVOC |
| 9 (RLIN) |
11710 |
| 700 1# - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
|---|
| 9 (RLIN) |
22461 |
| Personal name |
Szczygiel, J. |
| 700 1# - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
|---|
| 9 (RLIN) |
22462 |
| Personal name |
Kulazynski, M. |
| 773 0# - HOST ITEM ENTRY |
|---|
| Title |
Biotechnology for Biofuels |
| Related parts |
v. 14, art. 19 |
| Place, publisher, and date of publication |
London (United Kingdom) : BioMed Central, 2021. |
| International Standard Serial Number |
1754-6834 |
| 856 4# - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS |
|---|
| Uniform Resource Identifier |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-020-01864-z |
| Link text |
Click here to access online |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) |
|---|
| Koha item type |
Article |
| Source of classification or shelving scheme |
Dewey Decimal Classification |
| Suppress in OPAC |
No |