Knowledge Center Catalog

Means to an end : (Record no. 62325)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 01942nab|a22002897a|4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field 62325
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field MX-TxCIM
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20240826224818.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 200722s2015||||xxk|||p|op||||00||0|eng|d
022 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD SERIAL NUMBER
International Standard Serial Number 0957-8811
022 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD SERIAL NUMBER
International Standard Serial Number 1743-9728 (Online)
024 8# - OTHER STANDARD IDENTIFIER
Standard number or code https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2014.54
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Original cataloging agency MX-TxCIM
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE
Language code of text/sound track or separate title eng
100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Hansen, H.
9 (RLIN) 14838
245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Means to an end :
Remainder of title the importance of the research question for systematic reviews in International development
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Place of publication, distribution, etc. United Kingdom :
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. Springer,
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2015.
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE
General note Peer review
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. Systematic reviews are increasingly used to inform policy makers about the usefulness of interventions. We stress the importance of the research question and argue that traditional Cochrane reviews work best for the focused question ‘what works’, while many policy interventions give rise to complex questions such as ‘when’, ‘why’, ‘how’ and ‘for whom’ the interventions ‘work’. We categorise the questions and use this as a basis for a typology of systematic reviews. We illustrate the usefulness of the typology by examining reviews of development interventions. These reviews have followed a general trend, moving from focused questions to complex questions, and this gives rise to the same problems and discussions about evidence-ranking and the use of programme theory as witnessed within systematic reviews of interventions in public health and education. We argue that the review question is a natural starting point for developing new practices for systematic reviews.
546 ## - LANGUAGE NOTE
Language note Text in English
650 #7 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element Development
Source of heading or term AGROVOC
9 (RLIN) 1549
650 #7 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element Research
Source of heading or term AGROVOC
9 (RLIN) 9142
650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element Analysis
Miscellaneous information AGROVOC
9 (RLIN) 27824
700 1# - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Trifković, N.
9 (RLIN) 14839
773 0# - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Place, publisher, and date of publication United Kingdom : Springer, 2015.
International Standard Serial Number 0957-8811
Related parts v. 27, no. 5, p. 707-726
Title European Journal of Development Research
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Koha item type Article
Suppress in OPAC No
Source of classification or shelving scheme Dewey Decimal Classification
Holdings
Date last seen Total Checkouts Price effective from Koha item type Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Collection code Withdrawn status Home library Current library Date acquired
07/24/2020   07/24/2020 Article Not Lost Dewey Decimal Classification     Reprints Collection   CIMMYT Knowledge Center: John Woolston Library CIMMYT Knowledge Center: John Woolston Library 07/24/2020

International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) © Copyright 2021.
Carretera México-Veracruz. Km. 45, El Batán, Texcoco, México, C.P. 56237.
If you have any question, please contact us at
CIMMYT-Knowledge-Center@cgiar.org