Knowledge Center Catalog

Local cover image
Local cover image

Motivations and incentives for mechanization in Zambia : a mixed-methods analysis

By: Contributor(s): Material type: ArticleLanguage: English Publication details: United Kingdom : Taylor & Francis, 2025.ISSN:
  • 2331-1886 (Online)
Subject(s): Online resources: In: Cogent Social Sciences United Kingdom : Taylor & Francis, 2025. v. 11, no. 1, art. 2588017Summary: Smallholder farmers in Zambia face low agricultural productivity, and while tractor mechanization offers a solution, adoption rates remain low. The contextual factors driving this low uptake, including farmers’ preferences for different ownership and financing models, are not well understood. This study uses a mixed-methods approach, including surveys with 208 farmers, 18 focus group discussions (FGDs) and 28 key informant interviews (KIIs) across three districts in Zambia to examine these issues. The analysis shows that the motivations for tractor ownership are centred around both productivity enhancement and income generation through service provision, with farmers valuing tractors’ ability to improve operational timeliness given narrowing planting windows. The results reveal a clear divergence in ownership preferences. Individual ownership is favoured by male farmers and those in more mechanized districts seeking operational autonomy, while group ownership is preferred by female farmers and those in less-mechanized areas for its cost-sharing and risk-management benefits. In terms of incentives for ownership, risk-contingent credit (RCC), particularly when bundled with repair insurance, emerges as the most desirable incentive for encouraging tractor ownership. This highlights the need to de-risk mechanization investments. Key barriers to adoption include high maintenance costs, poor access to spare parts and the financial strains due to social obligations. These results demonstrate that a ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach to promoting mechanization is ineffective. Instead, successful interventions must be flexible, gender-responsive and tailored to the local context. Such an approach would likely increase ownership and improve livelihoods.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Status
Article CIMMYT Knowledge Center: John Woolston Library CIMMYT Staff Publications Collection Available
Total holds: 0

Peer review

Open Access

Smallholder farmers in Zambia face low agricultural productivity, and while tractor mechanization offers a solution, adoption rates remain low. The contextual factors driving this low uptake, including farmers’ preferences for different ownership and financing models, are not well understood. This study uses a mixed-methods approach, including surveys with 208 farmers, 18 focus group discussions (FGDs) and 28 key informant interviews (KIIs) across three districts in Zambia to examine these issues. The analysis shows that the motivations for tractor ownership are centred around both productivity enhancement and income generation through service provision, with farmers valuing tractors’ ability to improve operational timeliness given narrowing planting windows. The results reveal a clear divergence in ownership preferences. Individual ownership is favoured by male farmers and those in more mechanized districts seeking operational autonomy, while group ownership is preferred by female farmers and those in less-mechanized areas for its cost-sharing and risk-management benefits. In terms of incentives for ownership, risk-contingent credit (RCC), particularly when bundled with repair insurance, emerges as the most desirable incentive for encouraging tractor ownership. This highlights the need to de-risk mechanization investments. Key barriers to adoption include high maintenance costs, poor access to spare parts and the financial strains due to social obligations. These results demonstrate that a ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach to promoting mechanization is ineffective. Instead, successful interventions must be flexible, gender-responsive and tailored to the local context. Such an approach would likely increase ownership and improve livelihoods.

Text in English

Ngoma, L.M. : Not in IRS staff list but CIMMYT Affiliation

Rumbidzai Mhembere : Not in IRS staff list but CIMMYT Affiliation

Manyanga, M. : Not in IRS staff list but CIMMYT Affiliation

Simutowe, E. : Not in IRS staff list but CIMMYT Affiliation

CGIAR Trust Fund European Union (EU) Climate adaptation & mitigation Environmental health & biodiversity Diversification in East and Southern Africa Resilient Agrifood Systems

https://hdl.handle.net/10568/179022

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Local cover image
Share

International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) © Copyright 2021.
Carretera México-Veracruz. Km. 45, El Batán, Texcoco, México, C.P. 56237.
If you have any question, please contact us at
CIMMYT-Knowledge-Center@cgiar.org